I'm J. Gabriel Boylan and I write about music, books, and culture. Here I will offer links to and reprints of my writings, as well as occasional musings on important matters, like who's cooler: Nicky Hopkins or Terry Reid? Stuff like that.

RIP Sugar Minott, a wonderfully mellow artist who I discovered quite by accident when my partner thought she was ordering a single by 60s girl group The Cake and instead got a very different sort of confection in the mail. Since then I’ve found Minott’s music to conform perfectly to all that I love about 80s reggae.

Some New Thunder

I’ve been neglectful about posting, so here are a number of stories I’ve been working on lately.

Most recently, I got a chance to review a truly fascinating work, Marvin D. Sterling’s Babylon East, an investigation into reggae, dancehall, and rastafari culture in Japan, for Bookforum.

For the Boston Globe Ideas section I wandered a bit off the path of music- and culture-oriented material and interviewed Stan Cox, who wrote a book about air conditioning and the challenges we face moving forward in a hot world with only this very low-efficiency, energy-sucking technology to help cool us off.

In another direction I reviewed Sheila Rowbotham’s Dreamers of a New Day, a history of feminism from the late-19th century through the 1930s, for the Barnes & Noble Review

I got to interview a hero, Greil Marcus, about his most recent book on Van Morrison, When the Rough God Goes Riding, and we spoke about the book as well as the practice of music writing in general. A really nice talk, I thought.

Someday soon my story in The Nation will be available to non-subscribers. If you are among the lucky few who subscribes then please check it out here. In it I discuss Dave Tompkins’ excellent, giddy tome on the history of the vocoder. I had a piece in the magazine earlier this year on the past and future of music production and industry.

And something I always forget to link is my work reviewing for Spin, where I’ve written on albums by Jamie Lidell, Nas & Damian Marley, Devin the Dude, and Caribou in the last few months.

Update: Bookforum review, which meshes with the below post about sound environments quite nicely, is now live.

http://www.bookforum.com/inprint/017_01/5375

Music From Airports

Over the weekend I took a trip down South to visit a dear friend and with the intention to achieve as little as possible, unless such achievements as inactivity and mellow-making are to be considered achievements. It was a rousing success in this a(nti)chievement regard, but several moments along the way got me thinking about sound environments, sound artifacts, and how hard it is to listen most of the time.

In order to save a whopping $20, I opted for a severely early flight out of New York, and due to some unfortunate circumstances I was obliged to stay out quite late the night before said flight. After a one-hour night’s sleep I caught a cab to LaGuardia and there commenced my first awkward interaction with sound for the weekend.

Still relatively buzzed from the night before, but mostly just exhausted, I slumped into a seat inside the terminal, facing the McDonald’s. Though the restaurant was shut for the night (this was 5am), a crew of fans had begun gathering near the closed gates awaiting the first McMuffins of the day (due around 5:45). As I observed this mass of hunger, I noted that though nearly every eatery and shop in the terminal was closed, though there was barely anyone even in the airport, the radio was on.

Certainly this isn’t, in itself, surprising. Plenty of places of business leave the music on even if nobody’s around. Muzak was invented, many decades ago, expressly to fill the air with sound at all hours (and to lull workers into maximum drone-ness, but that’s another story). What was intriguing was, for one, the mix of tunes playing: Bat For Lashes’ “Daniel” into Yes’ “Owner of a Lonely Heart” into Glass Candy into Skynyrd, and so on, and for another, that any of this was audible. And yet amazingly, especially with the increasing grumbles (stomach and verbal) of the McD’s crowd, the tunes were only just audible.

I realized that never in all my time in airports, and certainly not in the past few months, where I’ve taken a number of flights, do I recall hearing music of any kind that I could recognize. Routinely noisy spaces, terminals are something I associate with harried movement, beeping peoplemovers, muffled announcements, the low roar of the aircraft outside, and centrally, cable news. Yet apart from headphones, never music. But this suggested it had been playing all the time, just another layer in a constantly noisemaking public space. Why in spaces where it would actually be helpful to have at least some quiet is there this insistence on unceasing din?

The cable news really got to me that last time I was in an airport: there is nowhere to go, virtually, to escape either the sound or image of CNN or whoever dominates a given airport. So sure. It’s the attractive concept of never-ending advertisement, or even the onus of perpetuating the 24-hour news cycle. But this recent radio episode took my thoughts to another level. It’s systemic, this whole affair. The airport wants to envelop us in sound not merely because it can accrue income from the cable stations, the music programmers, and whoever else is pumping in sound, but because we have come to feel that sounding spaces are spaces that care about us. Just as often you step from the terminal onto a plane and there’s more music on, even in the blessed lav. Never be alone. We wonder why noise levels rise but not every space is subject to traffic or industry or commerce. Airports would seem to present all three, but in fact offer spaces that could serve those who pass through by excising sound, if only people felt comfortable in quiet places. Decrepit through a terminal might be, sound is the enlivening force too. You don’t feel as though you’re in a forgotten room someplace, you feel as though you’re in the center of a buzzing, frenetic hub. Why do we need to feel this way everywhere, though? I hope to consider this question in the coming weeks.

Safely out of all terminals and ensconced in the idyll of my friend’s backwoods backyard, it was as quiet as I’ve been in many months. Yet we know quiet when we hear it, because we do hear it. I heard birds, buzzing insects, the occasional distant flyover, and very remotely the whoosh of traffic out on the main road. But I could hear all these things, distinctly, able to gauge distances between them and myself. As the weekend passed we listened to a lot of music out there, laying in our loungers chatting, and it felt like the listening was a lot deeper than I can recall from the past few weeks, where I am as often performing several tasks while listening as simply sitting there trying to take something in.

But back to the airport because this morning, on my regrettably necessary return to real life, passing through the Raleigh-Durham airport I noted an absence of music, and even the cable news proved escape-able. I wondered if the airport had made a positive decision about the relative anxiety already being experienced by most travelers and its potential role in maybe not making said anxiety worse? Nonsense, I thought. Like the “Wolfgang Puck To-Go” venue I tried vainly to locate, the airport simply hadn’t yet developed its sonic womb. To my delight, on arrival back in New York I entered the terminal and couldn’t hear anything at all, just a little bit of everything all at once and without pause.

I have been wrestling with These New Puritans’ music since I got their debut album Beat Pyramid in 2008. Everything about their sound appeals to me, from the grindy, repetitive beat patterns to the no wave exhaustion pervading everything (particularly the vocals, which bring to mind Underworld or a post-shock-treatment Arab Strap) to the cyclical repetitions of refrains and self-quotations. All very satisfying and tense and up one of my alleys. And yet, although I kept listening to it at the time, I never quite felt at home. It was so archly, self-congratulatingly art rock that it felt too much like a pose. Then their work in fashion circles (penning a song for the Dior Homme collection) only served to accentuate my inkling that this was style over substance. But then this is my constant dilemma with art rock, and it came to mind yesterday as I was reading Dick Hebdige’s fascinating Subculture: The Meaning of Style (Routledge, 1979) with the following passage:

Certainly Bowie’s position was devoid of any obvious political or counter-cultural significance…his entire aesthetic was predicated upon a deliberate avoidance of the “real” world and the prosaic language in which that world was habitually described, experienced, and reproduced. (61)

Hebdige goes on to qualify that while Bowie did have transgressive elements, and was liberated in fairly obvious ways in reference to gender and sexuality, the key referents were either from an imaginary past (Weimar fantasy) or an imagined future, and therefore the transgression was delimited, perhaps even part of the fantasy of escape. I disagree vehemently, though I would not attribute any clear political agenda to Bowie’s style or his aesthetic, or any of the glam bands, certainly not in comparison to the punk and reggae Hebdige is focused upon. While that may be so, Bowie does signify politically and culturally, as does much of the best art rock. In this way it’s not merely escape but allows for the possibility of re-entry. The inherent challenge, as a friend put it, is that “he dares you to try and engage the world post-him.”

Yet to get back to These New Puritans, I watched this new video of theirs today and something just clicked, because while this aesthetic, this sound, and certainly these visual signifiers are all very wrapped up in a potentially solipsistic art practice, in a messy collision of high ideas and low-cultural tidbits (the fitted, the “characters” dancing) that need serve no one but These New Puritans, that could very well be pure style, it didn’t come across that way. It came across as essential, and loaded in generative ways, and it seemed to me at least that the fitted and the characters and the way this music sounds like Wu-Tang crossed with Throbbing Gristle embodies the potential of art rock right now to have a shitload more politicized or culturally conversant meaning than, say, the recent turns to psychedelia (Dearhunter or Animal Collective might be utopian, but are not politically engaged), or shitty-sounding sigh-fi, surf-drone, shit-gaze (guh!), or whatever (Best Coast, Washed Out, or Wavves are just the sound of apathy, and maybe that’s just the limitations of an over-determined genre, but there seems not even the possibility for a cultural conversation to take place there). Talk about escape. And listen, I adore escape music (The PiƱa Colada Song being just one example), and it is a wonderful part of music that it can take us away from ourselves.

But music that offers a space in which to contemplate the pace and scope and meanness and circumscribed release of our “real” world is imminently enticing as well, and we deserve more of it. It sounds like the opposite of escape, yet its distance, the distance that art allows, makes the experience tenable, reflective, without feeling overly safe, and offers that point of re-entry instead.

Silent Light

I’ve got a review of two books that deal with issues of silence and music in the brand new Bookforum, which has a truly miraculous cover image:

http://www.bookforum.com/inprint/017_01

Can’t read without a subscription yet, but you can buy a copy!

You Are My Day

My thoughts on Alex Chilton can be read here: http://www.moreintelligentlife.com/blog/j-gabriel-boylan/alex-chilton

A very merry unbirthday

Don’t you know there’s a stronger thing keeping us together

Don’t you know there’s a song to sing

Sing on, let the feeling take you high

Welcome might be too strong a word to use just yet. Right now you’ve come over to visit my new place but there’s no furniture, none of my stuff, and also no walls, ceiling, or floor. It’s a space in name only, so you’ll have to bear with me as I construct the frame of the place, decide how best to enclose the rooms, figure out how to piece together the plumbing, and determine where on earth to store all these records.

Records are going to be the focus of my writing here, all sorts of records that I know and you know and I will know as they come to me and you will know as I offer them, or at least my view of them, to you. There will be other ideas too, about art and about commerce and about how we see and hear things now.

The real thing is the spirit I want to imbue into my work here, which is one of continuous curiosity about and serious scholarship into the pathways and systems of music. That, to me, is how you let the feeling take you high.